From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C654F3858C83; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:07:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C654F3858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682114861;
	bh=C7lzWUt4vTtRuKkQcTIrmmSgwvGRFUXjQ0iZUD40awc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pDloimNQoir59bsvdfIQlkpcRgTr8oFEas9CrutjisTnMXEPBLTFKqWaTSqVT16/M
	 yfOG8wXdjULhJVbJ0seOSPhpI1DolKxo8r1LTYmuobt5blZbQhFp4eZh6R4IWlqCER
	 NrtNBDfn+U9+LsuXBPJ0Zx0VKC0iDSWgEAcYkEMo=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106888] [RISCV] Negative optimization that
 excess andi instructions are generated  in gcc.dg/pr90838.c
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:07:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106888-4-TxQHHqPkfu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106888-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106888-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106888

--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So coming back to this after a couple months, I'm confident the match.pd ch=
ange
is unnecessary and in fact wrong.  So we definitely want to set that aside.=