From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7C5A03857701; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:11:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7C5A03857701
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1694470266;
	bh=AM3DFOT4RZG6oByXG70QbRQJ+GLL0imEqaDxBhvhWq4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yZoH3Efza7gVenHEno8Y9/ECaAm98jAkpFWZMPShYxO6KY/7kDO5QjckUsemVZiZq
	 MdoMDTyA0v5CZIXNl0kY2fwF7T9h5J96Xd0aUiNLS57BDHniGar+zoA77WfWkMAa91
	 lxPvBtwnopLCoL/zPd6u1Eh5DIZrfz5VW2yyPweU=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106890] [11 Regression] virtual inheritance triggers
 compiler error when instatiating derived class with in-class initialization
 since r8-2709-g12659e10c7820071
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:11:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106890-4-4A0jpcEZkn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106890-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106890-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106890

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d7e5f90597167c36c7816f5bcf689472e8b1940

commit r11-10982-g0d7e5f90597167c36c7816f5bcf689472e8b1940
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon May 1 10:57:20 2023 -0400

    c++: array DMI and member fn [PR109666]

    Here it turns out I also needed to adjust cfun when stepping out of the
    member function to instantiate the DMI.  But instead of adding that twe=
ak,
    let's unify with instantiate_body and just push_to_top_level instead of
    trying to do the minimum subset of it.  There was no measurable change =
in
    compile time on stdc++.h.

    This should also resolve 109506 without yet another tweak.

            PR c++/106890
            PR c++/109666

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * name-lookup.c (maybe_push_to_top_level)
            (maybe_pop_from_top_level): Split out...
            * pt.c (instantiate_body): ...from here.
            * init.c (maybe_instantiate_nsdmi_init): Use them.
            * name-lookup.h: Declare them..

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array2.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template25.C: New test.=