From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7D0763858C62; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:14:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D0763858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1662815665;
	bh=udToM1xoUFYwlcuOFNguxRTbTjJQjB65/6puOtODfQE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=je/JAtDpmD/6EbBmdxphMWacOQ6+V0QCNlMJqACj8y9NTCNt3bd+7sRhyjWdqP7Nh
	 +YoRsox57VIAmoVz+ZEGaRP5/CJRRxZIs++TYO/ospUss5U/CwESs29GfoiqGFTPfo
	 PXDY9zFxd9v7gy1q9zdfZvassSbHqyvrZTVXAe9M=
From: "mikpelinux at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/106892] [11/12 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on
 x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-963-g80d6f89e78fc3b77
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:14:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpelinux at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106892-4-Ee6DJ6hvqo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106892

Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mikpelinux at gmail dot com

--- Comment #12 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
>             PR tree-optimization/106722

Shouldn't that be 106892?

>             * tree-predcom.cc (ref_at_iteration): Do not associate the
>             constant part of the offset into the MEM_REF offset
>             operand, across a non-zero offset.
>=20=20=20=20=20
>             * gcc.dg/torture/pr106892.c: New testcase.=