From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 77A4D3856DD6; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:34:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 77A4D3856DD6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663083268; bh=B+eLO/Z/r55HU7grl3L/5ZgnltKnkH1x/vxc4KcgJc0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LIEVyzs00r3oVL8qFyXJQpL6qUlMG48c7/xOK/0/hujUIulK6W4wBO2/vJ1K3h9PC 8uGn7ghnBRz+hUayKMSRXKkf2iUsQdf6kSFLZh0GsFczvqV0ZisDjnkN4WCIV3fmlY YfBJGX1hmafL/Oy66ZHW38ojgJ7lSag/Fxwvvc94= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106895] powerpc64 strange extended inline asm behaviour with register pairs Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:34:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: inline-asm X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106895 Segher Boessenkool changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- wQ is a memory constraint, not a register constraint. We have no way to express even/odd in register constraints. You can force it some other way? It's a lot easier if you use __atomic_* instead of inline asm? Like: void f(unsigned __int128 *addr, unsigned __int128 val) { __atomic_store_n(addr, val, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); } Please reopen if you want something in particular to be changed. Thanks!=