From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D5433385141E; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 13:41:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D5433385141E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663162906; bh=mpX76QNu4treSThRbhcmjUkgzYqsVdpEp6F6Lld4gVE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HTOGS+D/7t81kB5MjCDgCSVu7wGeWJXVOWAfu9GJAsWJ8uLNsMjt2cT2+n3xw2Juk XRjby8nLZOrmvdN+afkWeFtyhyKnXJ0IpcG0z/SmxUXJOOFcLPAssxG1CEHgqFtlwA BY6hayQvB8jAhzB/UMXh63Fr+41W+8MyjaEvzdMw= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106896] [13 Regression] ICE in to_sreal_scale, at profile-count.cc:339 since r13-2288-g61c4c989034548f4 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 13:41:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106896 --- Comment #5 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- > Modelling it > as a probability would cap one of the two cases to 1 (i.e. same as > equal counts). You are correct, Honza should answer here!=