From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7346E3858C83; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 18:27:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7346E3858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1662834478;
	bh=nB8DY3t7Igm6S1+nsOh/srgUQ8s5H8YixXpQxUBhsH0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cm69yqXx7j5o8/VDkiYNqmtoJxu1YM8IDhCzYc9CMC1qTnlXC6+n6AepW/e07VceB
	 EmlBA25Ux6GpJI1hBZyCiJ6rmzoT0BIcq80fJwRqiQYgbpJqAuyIpMP9aXo4tBQKRv
	 h5QBuj/xmY+BLkHdaQgrEf7si2gAEchfPtl43ev8=
From: "carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106901] False positive -Warray-bounds with -O2 or higher?
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 18:27:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106901-4-US6bsTh342@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106901

--- Comment #4 from Carlos Galvez <carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com> ---
Makes sense!

Would it make sense to classify this as "maybe-array-bounds" instead? Simil=
ar
to "maybe-uninitialized" vs "uninitialized"=