public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106902] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Program compiled with -O3 -mfma produces different result
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 16:03:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106902-4-f1tINtFUsl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
--- Comment #26 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > Did you run into any of NON_LVALUE / C_MAYBE_CONST wrappings of the
> > multiplication btw?
>
> No, I'm not familiar with those, so I didn't try to construct corresponding
> testcases.
I had a look now. My understanding is they are eliminated in c_fully_fold, so
c_gimplify_expr will not encounter those trees.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-10 18:58 [Bug tree-optimization/106902] New: Program compiled with -O3 -fmfa " jhllawrence963 at gmail dot com
2022-09-10 19:07 ` [Bug target/106902] Program compiled with -O3 -mfma " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-12 8:01 ` [Bug target/106902] [11/12/13 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-12 14:08 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-12 14:10 ` [Bug target/106902] [11/12 " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-13 7:06 ` [Bug target/106902] [11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-14 15:20 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 9:33 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-17 18:19 ` jhllawrence963 at gmail dot com
2022-09-17 18:23 ` jhllawrence963 at gmail dot com
2022-09-19 7:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19 7:14 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19 7:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19 8:14 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19 9:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 18:31 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 6:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 11:28 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 13:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-09-30 6:17 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 17:32 ` [Bug target/106902] [11/12/13/14 " amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 6:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 18:49 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 18:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 5:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 8:31 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 16:03 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-05-18 16:52 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-29 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-106902-4-f1tINtFUsl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).