From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D1434385C405; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:06:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D1434385C405 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663052805; bh=HgHQUUy8QSKNMVjovxKzaq4rgxY3J+hZzlvqTxtvwFs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XzmoNqA/ZNu2i3zZLXb3EtXMA/pRl7U3PCMaXS9Mrrs3DviXhuGdZySTDc1Dxlqyg kXmuD1D3vUUtZYgdOoSRlwLXaxq3v9KoySJ8xkDRiCjSBLTjRYFEWC7zApH2n4I/Kg QrZoCQvvadBB8GUe7T9nw0y3IWRUBfEf00UpWeRc= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106902] [11/12/13 Regression] Program compiled with -O3 -mfma produces different result Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:06:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc blocked Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106902 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[11/12 Regression] Program |[11/12/13 Regression] |compiled with -O3 -mfma |Program compiled with -O3 |produces different result |-mfma produces different | |result Blocks| |53947 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #4) > Fixed on master with r13-1450-gd2a898666609452e. > Started with r11-4637-gf5e18dd9c7dacc96. I believe both a are unrelated. The fix possibly caused a missed optimizat= ion while the cause exposed some opportunity. More analysis is needed here. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53947 [Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations=