public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106912] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032 since r13-1575-gcf3a120084e94614
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:56:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106912-4-wd1sI4B12v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106912-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org         |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Sure, the FUNCTION_TYPE can be shared, so shouldn't be overwritten in place,
> but can be copied with TREE_READONLY cleared on the copy.
> So, if we for whatever reason need to clear const flag on some functions,
> after clearing TREE_READONLY on the node->decl we'd also need to update the
> TREE_TYPE to a version without TREE_READONLY set (so that say if new calls
> are created they don't get wrong fntype) and then walk all call edges to
> that function, updating gimple_call_fntype to the updated type if it was
> equal to the old TREE_TYPE, or to a copy with TREE_READONLY cleared if it
> has TREE_READONLY set on the FUNCTION/METHOD_TYPE).

That will not catch indirect calls to the function.  So whatever we do
this part of the problem will remain (the out-of-sync profile).  Like

inline int __attribute__((const))
foo (int i)
{
  if (i == 0)
    return 2;
  return 1;
}

int (* __attribute__((const)) bar) () = foo;

int main()
{
  int r = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < 10000; ++i)
    {
      r += foo (r);
      r += bar (r);
    }
  return r;
}

which, when compiled with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fprofile-arcs results
in the edge counters from the inline copy via foo to be store-motion'ed
but the indirect call clobbering them each iteration.

Using -fprofile-use prevents this because we get an indirect call profiler
call which clobbers all memory, confusing LIM, doing early inlining will
early inline the function before profile instrumentation.

I cannot see how we can fix this without some global flag to ignore
const/pure-ness of functions or alternatively dropping DECL_NONALIASED.
Trying to support surgical un-setting of pure/const for single functions
isn't going to work.  Simply disabling IPA inlining for instrumented
builds might also work.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-12 17:23 [Bug c/106912] New: [13 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-12 19:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106912] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032 since r13-1575-gcf3a120084e94614 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-13  6:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-13  7:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-13  8:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-25  7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 17:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-12 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-12-20  0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-06 12:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-06 12:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-07 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-16 12:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-24 12:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-24 12:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106912-4-wd1sI4B12v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).