From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6B7663839DF8; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:17:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B7663839DF8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663060648;
	bh=VQKjq81VgKLNgSGE2B6gOfwLKOz/hh8DfVsVnSLnOi0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XCW0U2BEe7B4QVMUJZXcv26TvBbP1UJvxc6N8Z9v/ejtr1mzTHO8ZHSpAg5tpez4N
	 9IYdgxRtXv5cWt0U9tgpkXb+tYDcvh4HugyXoCucvNWUBtM7rGKNwmnmc4no4pi3oj
	 y+sW94TY+AmLUUUJ/09JUBrNV98JwN51ZqXDeHho=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106921] [11/12.1] -O1 and -fipa-icf  -fpartial-inlining
 causes wrong code
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:17:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail keywords everconfirmed
 cf_reconfirmed_on cf_known_to_work bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-106921-4-BdEoheExRQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106921

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |11.3.0
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection, wrong-code
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-09-13
      Known to work|                            |10.4.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.=