From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BF7C83858CD1; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:41:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BF7C83858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700556072; bh=Xm04tav3zAvKGvsAZlC3wNbgW7lf5370jsJBMiGKoAw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XM1+wDLZSbc17sQqOOU187113vtgXCZmwKyoOZ06cqW6gN1yNGbxbxuZbj7JIxeug aiSRdc0gQgantry3VRU6B15uhjtOgModSTkIN2W3m9yn8zoMoLE6Lm1r3CA5cEbaQ2 q2jWEsctQoYtnvPMew8K7+S6xwtLZOvw/UeN8HAE= From: "lutztonineubert at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/106921] [11/12/13/14 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:41:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: lutztonineubert at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106921 --- Comment #8 from Toni Neubert --- Hello, I just wanted to ask what the state of this bug is?=20 I think that incorrectly compiled code should be much more important than anything else since any system can be affected without even knowing it. I know that a lot of things happen here on a voluntary basis and I value th= at very much. What can we do to give such bugs a hire priority or help to solve such thin= gs?=