public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106922] [12 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning on boost::optional<<std::vector<std::string>>>, missed FRE
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:44:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106922-4-Bl1vpp08VY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922

--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, jan.zizka at nokia dot com wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
> 
> --- Comment #25 from Jan ?i?ka <jan.zizka at nokia dot com> ---
> I have backported all three patches but true that I didn't try to test without
> VN enhancement. Would it help if I'd try that with our production code and the
> reproducers? Or anything else I could try so that you'd know if the VM
> enhancement should be backported also?

They are clearly necessary to fix this bug.  What I'm unsure yet about
is the risk of generally enhancing VN for this diagnostic regression.
The enhancement itself is quite small and self-contained which is
why I'm still considering it ;)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-13  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-13  8:18 [Bug tree-optimization/106922] New: [12 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning on boost::optional<<std::vector<std::string>>> jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-09-13  9:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106922] [12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15  7:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106922] [12/13 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning on boost::optional<<std::vector<std::string>>>, missed FRE rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15  8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 11:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 12:12 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-09-15 12:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 12:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106922] [12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-15 22:13 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-09-19 14:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19 15:03 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-09-21  6:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-21 12:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-22 11:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-22 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-23  7:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-23 11:31 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-09-23 11:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-23 13:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-23 13:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-23 14:22 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-10-11 12:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-11 12:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-11 13:13 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-10-13  7:44 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2022-10-13 10:50 ` jan.zizka at nokia dot com
2022-10-17 13:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 13:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 13:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 13:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106922-4-Bl1vpp08VY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).