From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 878653857BB4; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:08:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 878653857BB4
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665490086;
	bh=ftBp1HrgUyTBUaVKJ7P1bosIaRjUyPQHHLEOxSwahwo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bxY/CLaDC8NGFSiAEiUYQDss53FcP1M48VWz1snMV4JrywyXTJZPys7wf/FHPqqd2
	 ZRAu6hbE2WCICuhZJnOH4u4ClOsyBU1WdQNC5i0ILNzdw8T4JaF3l23P8ywOoveDAv
	 M3NbpvtNrPCXbNd4MZKdcdlh2/w7CX7h7jWFFmtY=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106922] [12 Regression] Bogus uninitialized
 warning on boost::optional<<std::vector<std::string>>>, missed FRE
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:08:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106922-4-C93Rgw6fp2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106922-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106922

--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note I'm still pondering whether to backport the VN enhancement, for now I'=
ve
backported the VN/PRE optimization regression fix.=