From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DCC623857BA2; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:57:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DCC623857BA2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663243055; bh=O3bGZbNFOwNjQAjJL31/yIXQ7uoFEoelnPt2NMAkp4Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BseZp6Tqbp7fmWgVS2MAG7VTshOv/lfc88TPIjYWzYJLvOItQCKrhIIlsngZv9v0t h/AnV4E7KtcjJ5bPrXahaRDr+Vefw/rgWmnonQ10BLR+29H/CUYL3yuLT0OGJBESU+ XkXEHTP+jIIdrHLk4T052EwBdmsN68nyoRPzxXw4= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106922] [12/13 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning on boost::optional<>>, missed FRE Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:57:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106922 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Anyhow - I'm testing a (half-way) fix for the issue in PRE, the testcase pr= oved quite useful. Thanks a lot for opening this bugreport!=