From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AAF4B3939C30; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:41:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AAF4B3939C30
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663137704;
	bh=N9F1WQug1zU0pIKD0URvScK1ijU7QmZOwFAi3bUwJT4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=J1AUsBGUWqGelke81JljflONRuy3RliGjpIxHL29IzSzSYzlMr6htyLI1nj0r02Us
	 +QdgyhhxhDOy6g+MRSbgHVtrL/BAeD8hqcIrhKjhZGSuDXsVru8aVM2AOiqd76p4UV
	 yp/1qSCzfYHRcGpmvOzCJOf2giRy6FF6oO2MSf5c=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106934] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE:
 verify_gimple failed since r9-5682-gef310a95a934d0f3
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:41:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status component keywords
Message-ID: <bug-106934-4-DqIqz2VPww@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106934

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
          Component|fortran                     |tree-optimization
           Keywords|                            |ice-checking,
                   |                            |ice-on-valid-code

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We are folding

 __builtin_memcpy (&transfer.0, &b, 1);

to

  _12 =3D BIT_FIELD_REF <b_13(D), 8, 0>;
  MEM[(c_char * {ref-all})&transfer.0] =3D _12;

where update_address_taken rewrites

  _12 =3D MEM[(c_char * {ref-all}&b];

to the BIT_FIELD_REF, exactly because the memory reference
references QImode but the variable has HImode so we cannot use
a VIEW_CONVERT to pun.

The logic in update-address-taken doesn't match that of the verifier here,
the variable is

 <var_decl 0x7ffff6523cf0 b
    type <boolean_type 0x7ffff653e0a8 logical(kind=3D2) public unsigned HI
        size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517dc8 constant 16>
        unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517de0 constant 2>
        align:16 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7ffff653e0a8 precision:1 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff6539180 0> max <integer_=
cst
0x7ffff65391b0 1>
        pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff670cb28>>
    used unsigned HI t.f90:3:18 size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6517dc8 16> unit-s=
ize
<integer_cst 0x7ffff6517de0 2>
    align:16 warn_if_not_align:0 context <function_decl 0x7ffff670e500 s>>

the intent of the verifier is to avoid the need to deal with referencing
padding in registers.  I'm not sure we absolutely have to uphold that
but a workaround would be to V_C_E the non-mode-precision operand to
a mode-precision operand and perform the BIT_FIELD_REF on that instead.
Note we don't seem to have any issue with non-integral typed non-mode-preci=
sion
operands here which is a bit inconsistent.

That was changed with the fix for PR88739.=