From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 547043858400; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:26:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 547043858400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663874797;
	bh=L1sqI365ed+KTXe09Q3ApzGMaWsJNsbJd86dUQFeXHU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZU3F8Fxf0krVDea5veKpqHcpmPcBSWo+28WISZAvHevgSKulctkwOBNUex/2ntZN2
	 UeA5t8cB3nngClSLRH2QUtdC7OIANvPUVCyVcyZdEGuX02XPRj2dczi4sXgTCxT331
	 obGHSBErqRyg2m6CdAuiNReOWW9Oh2exeCXJtN+8=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/106939] Linker-defined symbols are stained due to 'array
 subscript is partly outside array bounds' warning
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:26:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106939-4-g0Jcr7jn7H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106939-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106939-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106939

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In C99, it is in 6.5.8/5 (Relational operators).=