From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7EA143858C54; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:49:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7EA143858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683809357; bh=FUeuqfcQc8oMfckB+3iwOmUk9mr6M13sorYz7Z7/SPI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iySAU53A/Mm4ApMLu8ql+LI1nfaCHhYMrRXx5WjUqq+YDrv+Mgk+mBJX7/GL4f9Kp L+4QJkEyKaJIUmKEuvgO7m8/b37lNrKfY9cuYi/XNjqyGHzoiSPu6a3Q0CVlA8MAdO 9J8Nj8nDE5D13vGHvnW715qwpnATCIXKQe31SzLQ= From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/106943] GCC building clang/llvm with LTO flags causes ICE in clang Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:49:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-reduction, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106943 Alexander Monakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov --- I'm giving this a shot, and with -flto-partition=3D1to1 there's a ranger ICE (below). What's the current best practice for LTO debugging? I don't imagine there's= an easy way to identify which of 2000 lto1 invocation crashes, or attach gdb to it? Or at least generate a corefile? 0x10308fd internal_error(char const*, ...) ???:0 0x13dcf8c operator_bitwise_not::fold_range(irange&, tree_node*, irange cons= t&, irange const&, tree_code) const ???:0 0x136882a fold_using_range::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&) ???:0 0x1323eb5 fold_using_range::fold_stmt(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&, tree_node*) ???:0 0x134a417 path_range_query::range_of_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) ???:0 0x13499b4 path_range_query::range_defined_in_block(irange&, tree_node*, basic_block_def*) ???:0 0x135503a path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr(irange&, tree_node*, gimple*) ???:0 0x1368424 fold_using_range::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&) ???:0 0x1323eb5 fold_using_range::fold_stmt(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&, tree_node*) ???:0 0x134a417 path_range_query::range_of_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) ???:0 0x13499b4 path_range_query::range_defined_in_block(irange&, tree_node*, basic_block_def*) ???:0 0x135503a path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr(irange&, tree_node*, gimple*) ???:0 0x1368424 fold_using_range::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&) ???:0 0x1323eb5 fold_using_range::fold_stmt(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&, tree_node*) ???:0 0x134a417 path_range_query::range_of_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) ???:0 0x13499b4 path_range_query::range_defined_in_block(irange&, tree_node*, basic_block_def*) ???:0 0x135503a path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr(irange&, tree_node*, gimple*) ???:0 0x1368424 fold_using_range::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&) ???:0 0x1323eb5 fold_using_range::fold_stmt(irange&, gimple*, fur_source&, tree_node*) ???:0 0x134a417 path_range_query::range_of_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) ???:0=