From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 502493826FC7; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:54:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 502493826FC7
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663257248;
	bh=ESBbGyO8HnAaApn9P74VJFHKykHIYj4LFQK2CApjIHI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Sh/JqtG3+aH81MLlZkkkJGn8dxikLqfXjCRssMmRoMRyWkW9loW9Rz0+XDnaNGIaK
	 FsksO70V4s8Ja9qnUiYt4CHFZYI4MtT4W3VganV6EbSxZ+KB27ADZ777bPgJ77kIej
	 NminqozzTcnJuxIUv15nk7mlHIb4hV/leiB9tgwM=
From: "tavianator at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106952] Missed optimization: x < y ? x : y not lowered
 to minss
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:54:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tavianator at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106952-4-X79a3K26Kd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106952

--- Comment #2 from Tavian Barnes <tavianator at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> Note, your 'max' function is the same as 'min' (the issue remains with th=
at
> corrected).

Whoops, thanks.

Also I just noticed that GCC 12.2 does better (but not perfect) with=20

#define min(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y))
#define max(x, y) ((x) > (y) ? (x) : (y))

instead of the inline functions.  Doesn't seem to help GCC trunk though.=