From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C49613858C36; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 03:58:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C49613858C36
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688961521;
	bh=ltHTpiBnjKi2iMnDau27BurmV5wL1zdAYGQFAV6pXLk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RIThYE2KBNXDHTUNJJGvJF3mRTXBWiznXlT+6PsgHHaJkHB9moxkWoz1exyH0NTW0
	 sY/iCU7O23OHClIpxBXMGMCY0FABar50r1mEGoyGsT5QHXAarRC7VJ/YJlpPFxi3LT
	 fa4IJ26r416ij84sE2Ey+oPeGBhujv4kXo4d8W3Q=
From: "matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106966] [12/13/14 Regression] alpha cross build crashes
 gcc-12 "internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn"
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 03:58:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106966-4-EiaODl4fIR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106966

matoro <matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.
                   |                            |tk

--- Comment #9 from matoro <matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk> ---
(In reply to Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak from comment #8)
> Created attachment 55504 [details]
> Proposed patch.
>=20
> Can someone please bootstrap and test the attached patch?

I can queue this up to test on real hardware.  By bootstrap, do you mean wi=
th
--enable-bootstrap, and by test do you mean a full testsuite run or just
checking that it doesn't ICE on the reproducer here?=