From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 16ADA3858D28; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:48:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 16ADA3858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663656521; bh=GOlhIiQKzAzqvEGTGE3uMAd53HVzUPttg2j2cGebMrg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ieyh4BnTkUPSppHmG9rDcoUeasL86xaoqJdxkFi0ebIfkGb+ITTn2fzQ+Oe51HySM 2MtropP4Fi/KM5yYxVBe42IyAh3fepIsY0UoD+urs+gx+pX8Ih/TwDqD1077vF8MEd KBGufogjWG9X+P7odsUGwIb1dkkDffxL/ANnaf4o= From: "thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106972] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 on ARMeb when building gcc itself Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:48:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106972 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Petazzoni = --- Thanks for the quick feedback! I am not super familiar with iwmmxt, but as I understand it is used in Marvell PXA270 and above. While these are fairly o= ld indeed, their support is still maintained in the upstream Linux kernel, so = it would be odd to no longer have gcc support for them.=