From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A552C3858D38; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:10:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A552C3858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663686614; bh=QihdOPwK2e9k7QBzff2BVIjjnGyUksSZCZ9QXHVC4R8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=v/KmgM9BdX4lyb8kiC35lLTz+kkzgiCY/iEmglBdavu/Ncxy8yB0GPzwc/j6xnYvm 2tXnvpz2X+o8jwV1F9217CyQa0En7cemM4qZ9PxBFbeVhuILwSpmGqFiKBHeHLvCFh kiGVHxXkKfjJy7awUELhstNqI/e5jrObP4JRz+DA= From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106972] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 on ARMeb when building gcc itself Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:10:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106972 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- Nobody has proposed any patches yet, but I imagine we'd end up treating -mcpu=3Diwmmxt[2] in the same way as -mcpu=3Dxscale. Similarly for -march=3Diwmmxt[2].=