From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 19C6D3858C00; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:33:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19C6D3858C00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677195237; bh=O8lz6GdQR985tz3qB76d77eAys9/adzCY230fBJ9ntw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gxbxWJf8+tXegEje/gGPm6pFCijjRVv/YVuMihQeVgRER52fadLeaQFL+qC35MGPl G5eXeBJRTBixKu5E9ii9xSejQD2de0Ikd2UiSBZgs+SFQ/WzwnRh5pI2BrKkHbVpFv nt+tm6kporNLxw3ndpwVFBcrOq1XRtmtIef9bYPE= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug d/106977] [13 regression] d21 dies with SIGBUS on 32-bit Darwin Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:33:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: d X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106977 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #14) > So it would seem that we might want to find a reproducer that we can look= at > the various tree dumps and see if/where an sret is introduced? >=20 > (if that's not the cause, then we'll have to find a new hypothesis) POD vs non-POD (I think TYPE_ADDRESSABLE causes the difference but I am not 100% sure ...)=