From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9B7FB3858D32; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:38:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9B7FB3858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712079516; bh=qCrc/0ypzRYPKv6ilXBqsATeMqtwtPRmwtg2RePhDME=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fAIIFoTDaeDq4/OY8RqVSuLq2kqOGQW32TEoA1fFiPw2hTwm0pS+wg7v+Pk+8EN/7 5MUMPO2vSpxflam1pEQ6o4VC+/LtSq8pv83XP6OQeKAPfkBaSUuVblOiC4qb1kFEYb KlnfaP9kxXe8x2g0asOZbOuSI6tpwIRrK1Vj4zAA= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/106987] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:38:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status target_milestone resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106987 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|11.5 |13.3 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com from comment #8) > Hi Harald, >=20 > After a lot of messing around, I managed to backport the patch; essential= ly > by hand. However, two of the testcases ICEd in trans-array.cc and so the= re > were obviously dependences that I had missed. >=20 > I will not be backporting r14-1629, if for no other reason than it is not= a > regression but also because the amount of work that would be involved > doesn't warrant it. It's a pity that I didn't keep 13-branch up to speed > with mainline on the associate fixes but we will just have to live with it > now. Hi Paul, no problem, I manually removed the conflict and pushed after regtesting. Thanks for trying! As I said before, I will close this one as fixed with target milestone 13.3, as it does not make sense to try to backport all needed dependencies to 12, and this one is an ICE-on-invalid. @Gerhard: thanks for the report!=