From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 697693858D20; Mon,  1 Apr 2024 20:42:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 697693858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712004156;
	bh=/80wJM6eNAE0s/WVeaRr9fgd/Lmh5W0RB1sBpjjLwpk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Gc94YtYmqNOBT62KwaiXEt01BpXQ87Ht9FZJPmsB1vunpptWO7eUAjIKD1HgNWGF1
	 TX9ekBYcoUXgz+ZyBh9ZNsyqiVY/YM0BUMjNdBWXBDNLrGFHhwzEtVZTpv3iVZ7Fhl
	 m9bSERFpdwT4xzcs9sn4VuSNQT5HDvi6XGB07IRo=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/106987] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in
 simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 20:42:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-106987-4-wHbuuJ6Y6O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106987-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106987-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106987

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> Hi Harald,
>=20
> I am pinning this one on you since it needs backporting to 13-branch, at
> least. It also keeps the audit trail clean.

Hi Paul,

this one is at the top of my backport list.

It depends on backporting r14-8902 (mine), and has weak conflict if
r14-1629 (yours) is not backported, as testcase gfortran.dg/pr99350.f90
was introduced in that commit.

I could amend backporting the fix for the current PR as well as r14-8902
to 13-branch by removing the changes to pr99350.f90 from the backport.
That is likely the most simple solution, as backporting r14-1629 might
introduce regressions.

Nevertheless, the current fixes can only be backported to 13-branch,
as some of the infrastructure changes for better error recovery after
arithmetic errors and when array ctors are involved are to risky to
backport to 12-branch.

What do you think?=