From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E168B3858D32; Sun,  2 Oct 2022 20:05:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E168B3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664741147;
	bh=FIu+QrfCwjly+fC5YGk64BxYPTc9vyGP2U4D8OJiwmo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BxjzzssjKUjUSGy8NP3VUcJHixVlHEbuVV5WRRLR2A7ahyvoGTml2Fhxzq++s6iWH
	 xtJUWmTln3Mlh3gadcPZPO1580HDKSVIINHxjInvIPhh/wq4xXl6WDCPiFITKC49Cy
	 /2fmsO4a1gG9v/MWXxuQxYJ8HafSjQMmgdgRR7VU=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/107000] ICE in gfc_real2complex, at
 fortran/arith.cc:2243
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:05:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-107000-4-EiSzhzM8lN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107000

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #53601|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 53651
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D53651&action=3Dedit
Revised patch

This variant adds a check after the place Mikael pointed out, and
which verifies that the types of all elements of an array ctor
are the same.  Testing so far indicates that it is robust enough
for all cases discussed in this PR, although it mostly emits

Error: Cannot convert UNKNOWN to ...

for every expression involving a binary operator.

Is this going into the right direction?=