From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D13DD3858C52; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:58:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D13DD3858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663786703; bh=Qp/2zU02UJK5JlIn/67wLeLMzbfN1seaJdjHLszHYy4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OrEznr13Q/muxpA6yuurDBcqfIq2QH3USiW0s3UnjZCvzLH8fSk3oO+ER3l62Is+D NUteaVvwt/GgyGu57Z85JrR36ZRh6KdcwJwegKZp6m8OZgPGbD1x4qnTiOV9fdw4Dj lfDx9XAOSCS6SqdYN7WbnNICqVBh/CX8b+Cra0o8= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/107000] ICE in gfc_real2complex, at fortran/arith.cc:2243 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:58:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107000 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-21 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. Comment#0 is fixed by e.g. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc index d57059a375f..1f290050189 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc @@ -2238,6 +2238,9 @@ gfc_real2complex (gfc_expr *src, int kind) arith rc; bool did_warn =3D false; + if (src->ts.type !=3D BT_REAL) + return NULL; + result =3D gfc_get_constant_expr (BT_COMPLEX, kind, &src->where); mpc_set_fr (result->value.complex, src->value.real, GFC_MPC_RND_MODE); but comment#1 has a different stack trace, as it hits an assert.=