From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BB0263858D1E; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:19:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BB0263858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669745988; bh=pLYjSvnwF5xTOZTLxW0NWoiA/KqTG/Fj0CyYURESnWI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GlbE/it9wCAES45NN7khzqNlyYFoUhmgElYWugOanFQQIfTF7yONzdRevNS+nPgTl pIg/fRxes6ruVlcotN3WUQkIrZUAG4IFmWegTO5cUQgqZHVOt5FVFlhiIwjxJusUgN it3/ptD3na2vvdVGtHTRYE/qoo0Oj+JJbn8i5lWQ= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107004] [12 Regression] GCC12 warning in OOB access: array subscript is partly outside array bounds Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:19:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail short_desc cc cf_known_to_work keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107004 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail|13.0 | Summary|[12/13 Regression] GCC12 |[12 Regression] GCC12 |warning in OOB access: |warning in OOB access: |array subscript is partly |array subscript is partly |outside array bounds |outside array bounds CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work| |13.0 Keywords| |needs-bisection --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- This seems to be fixed since a while, not sure by what.=