From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DF6403858438; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:45:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DF6403858438 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663843516; bh=sYpH3arbF/zCGiygAy/pAU7G0VWh1v/L9ypshYeeGAk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yANy4cP7G93x4Y/TdcE+k+4AnPPPTewWNyD2VbGbQY3s99uE/DBsplRLc1cHpWcsj mryvEXAbvCF61G2y083YVrvDErw71vZHYSuoekRu5OEbbO41qIEV4fTYNUKnbeXKXD lixMcG+YgfKXJR5R1Byq3vctop6jRyADpAcDYLNA= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107008] Combine config/os/*/error_constants.h into one file Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:45:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107008 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D104883 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > A related topic is that we simply don't define the errc enumerators that > don't have a corresponding EXXXX macro, which is non-conforming. The C++ > standard says the enumerators should all be there. Oh that's PR 104883=