From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 18B1A385381E; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:17:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 18B1A385381E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1664183852; bh=7y3uUYPKOfGAl6cVPv1lxw+Bc1slABb46g9u+X0/aKA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=u2+v92kIlWAjNYfIngUCc74El5Az6GWxVV5zTM61yZoFhjdqHPTUUAOSgfYAwYDrN ND3hHABXwYBbm1XyNnJUQzUEY6uBTPlmOuWZ0vQhCGtSMMdUc2pQzY6rwkgnFmtUNm aNvjvZfYqYAwiDh835qifXWU0YJ1OlfntC5EojHg= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:17:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107021 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |13.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Btw, make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"--target_board=3Dunix/-march=3Dznver2/-Ofast vect.exp=3Dvect-tsvc-s1281.c" doesn't work to reproduce since the harness appends -O2, but I can reproduce with -Ofast -mavx2 on trunk. value: inf, expected: inf because } else if (!strcmp(name, "s1281")) { return INFINITY; and tatic _Bool is_checksum_same(real_t expected, real_t value) { if (expected =3D=3D INFINITY) return value =3D=3D INFINITY; is likely optimized away and we end up in else { real_t fraction =3D value / expected; return 0.99f <=3D fraction && fraction <=3D 1.01f; so I'd call that a testsuite issue. Do we know what goes wrong with povray?=