From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6CF633858CDA; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:52:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6CF633858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664189523;
	bh=t93xLokD3ryZwULGlMbyR/vUaaZOfPu6Asr/v+TwnMs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=f4JQToPaQKKgcVtqJ81sbZyyJtBvqL+kTETGhG0utf+3xuP6QxrRQre58z/7ddzZU
	 OwwOewrBVEdcjn1ton/F5g/rnLwJ0jxe57TJIPW3V8RUy3+0YdXZq3pGqyQcsvkLYm
	 K1PSpLfH6TciHxXzkIiyJ4E5ERRYs/vdpmRi5vFU=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error
 with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:52:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107021-4-ccNspI1S8Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107021-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107021-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107021

--- Comment #7 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #5)
> > >
> > > so I'd call that a testsuite issue.
> > >=20
> >=20
> > Yep, how should I fix the verifier? Just skip it if the expected value =
is
> > infinite?
>=20
> No, don't build it with -fno-finite-math-only?

That's fine for TSVC, I can adjust that. The question is what to do with
511.povray_r as we want to support SPECs with -Ofast.=