From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 827133858D1E; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 05:51:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 827133858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664085118;
	bh=0ZoBYqCf+6kNPM5gsoiMJvggbEcp4aTba0UY10OzQs8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fWpIL+vHlBAZIlPy7BD14aYbCL8vIi8IJIcuGlA7QTGZTxgNjquhUKtDt1qTeHKxG
	 HSFmL3vxhRGy030S/UeMVob+7kOr+N0dMqDynjcefmGkTOnpTODxTOIh3di/bbUHLo
	 EAuAHSmr88jUJWVO6UbFt0qaXm48TMeAbDWUPtyI=
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107028] [13 Regression][OpenACC] ICE in
 install_var_field, at omp-low.cc:797
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 05:51:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107028-4-uYK4Slq6dW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107028-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107028-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107028

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Minor postscript: While the following (reduced testcase in comment 0) looks=
 a
bit odd,

  int data;
  ...
  #pragma acc data copyin(a, a.data)

the original uses a pointer. Thus, something like
  int *data;
  ...
  #pragma acc data copyin(a, a.data[0:n])

which is more sensible. This variant still gives an ICE.
However, either variant shouldn't ICE

BTW: GCC 12 has the following omplower dump for this variant:
   #pragma omp target oacc_data \
        map(to:a [len: 8]) map(alloc:a.data [len: 8]) \
        map(to:*_8 [len: _7]) map(attach:a.data [bias: 0])

--------------------------------------
long long n =3D 10;

class data_container {
 public:
  int *data;
};

void test2() {
  data_container a;
  a.data =3D (int*)__builtin_malloc (n * sizeof (int));
#pragma acc data copyin(a, a.data[0:n])
{ }
}=