From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A25633858CDA; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:41:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A25633858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664217719;
	bh=yMuvo169YG3J5aorhpsDWHhvoBHG8n2pOFMJukr4Lpo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=m24XdV7jlwCFNPfAxxUk6O+JbWWaZt1eCPr6xUDOZaCpccfuBLt6APVRYVDXzFbWK
	 G6dhM5zAUJOJEdEv4hpoOYY2hXnc8mu4ykZAWegd3MCRSfrIYVK6fyFdkpvd2wzesI
	 yXPKy48x9aoO+qNnbQ4dd4dC8u/3T1flnH8Hp4j0=
From: "siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107038] [13 Regression] Bogus
 -Wstringop-overflow= since r13-2789-gb40b3035879cf695
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:41:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107038-4-U4YoTChy3a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107038-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107038-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107038

--- Comment #5 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #2)
> > > I assume this is elfutils #29614?
> >=20
> > Yes.
> >=20
> > Please take a look at the original unreduced testcase I attached here.
>=20
> That looks like unpatched elfutils.  I know you mentioned[1] that you're
> using the latest elfutils but can you please confirm again?  Or maybe
> incorrect preprocessed file?
>=20
> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29614#c2

OK maybe that's irrelevant from the gcc perspective because this is basical=
ly
warning on unreachable code, which we know tends to happen sometimes.  The
comment is mainly for the elfutils issue you're facing.=