From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 276C63858CDA; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:44:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 276C63858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1664181857; bh=CFmojlSftNBLbOrqviHuD46U+azxjAlfS74GuVxsFuc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=BP1ZF6qwt5EESUcOPQmNdHq4r/Og4R6umAvWSh6c0b9Sv5Sy+AtWb/o+bv/Df5lx3 4E893UpzkZoTAVTEZyko148qie5gwZ2MdL3msPAvQCyQTsGHFFGZ82+EXL97z3ddDr CpoN+D3FJEmvRBVFIlUPQqXtE/lJHOKWjX9qZgbQ= From: "jlame646 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/107039] New: GCC not diagnosing UB in constant expression Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:44:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jlame646 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107039 Bug ID: 107039 Summary: GCC not diagnosing UB in constant expression Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jlame646 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- GCC doesn't give diagnostic for the following program while clang and msvc = do. Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/o3K57fjeE ``` struct S { int a, b; }; constexpr void fn( S &s ) { (&s.b)[-1] =3D 123; } constexpr auto test =3D ([]{ S s; fn(s); }(), 0); ``` There should be a diagnostic for the above code.=