[Bug testsuite/107046] [13 Regression] Recent FP range work causing inf-2 to be miscompiled on rx-elf

["jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107046

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Given the magic hackery going on inside the RX target files, I wonder if we
> should skip the entire ieee suite for rx.

Doesn't add_options_for_ieee already handle RX though?
    if { [istarget rx-*-*] } {
       return "$flags -mnofpu"
    }
ieee.exp repeats some of the add_options_for_ieee stuff and more though, so
shouldn't we
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp.jj        2022-01-11
23:11:22.969282018 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp   2022-12-02
12:15:22.307173074 +0100
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ if { [istarget "alpha*-*-*"]
      || [istarget "sh*-*-*"] } then {
   lappend additional_flags "-mieee"
 }
+if [istarget rx-*-*] then {
+  lappend additional_flags "-mnofpu"
+}

 if { ![check_effective_target_signal] } {
     lappend additional_flags "-DSIGNAL_SUPPRESS"
?