From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6370E3858404; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:12:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6370E3858404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1664309526; bh=LJv1LsSzjvgnEnpp9axVH2TQdpUwvCCnop/5I6YksUg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bMvo5I4VbVhOkK1NNhuTZDG3Bio2FD800FINT01RMXtQSLwDhipoq9Ytk4XVEIqvt 3PHemOwiX3adnFs5xO93wNngmtWCFxaDt+ggn3X/IRRicabCdUnpz5mMoS0DSrz+uh KCZjd/N1wR04iW8ZB9Iv/fbYYWS8fP0vz/tb2FiI= From: "jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/107046] [13 Regression] Recent FP range work causing inf-2 to be miscompiled on rx-elf Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:12:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107046 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- First, let's not focus too much on that specific test. There's others: Tests that now fail, but worked before (20 tests): rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O1=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O2=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=3Dnone=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O3 -g=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -Os=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -O1=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -O2=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=3Dnone=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -O3 -g=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -Og -g=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-2.c execution, -Os=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -O1=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -O2=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=3Dnone=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -O3 -g=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -Og -g=20 rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/inf-3.c execution, -Os=20 Given the magic hackery going on inside the RX target files, I wonder if we should skip the entire ieee suite for rx.=