public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/107047] load introduced of struct fields after assigning it to a local variable Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:10:03 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-107047-4-0fwe9MZujt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-107047-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107047 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-27 Keywords| |missed-optimization Known to fail| |12.2.1, 13.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|rtl-optimization |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed, we see <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]: f[1][6] = g_36; _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <f[1][6], 32, 0>; _8 = _1 & 16777215; if (_8 != 0) VN probably sees the def but it doesn't consider replacing the use with a BIT_FIELD_REF of g_36, it just translates the ref but doesn't find any definition to CSE from. SRA says Candidate (1991): f Too big to totally scalarize: f (UID: 1991) Created a replacement for f offset: 848, size: 8: f$1$6$f1D.1996 Access trees for f (UID: 1991): access { base = (1991)'f', offset = 832, size = 64, expr = f[1][6], type = struct S6, reverse = 0, grp_read = 1, grp_write = 1, grp_assignment_read = 1, grp_assignment_write = 1, grp_scalar_read = 0, grp_scalar_write = 0, grp_total_scalarization = 0, grp_hint = 0, grp_covered = 0, grp_unscalarizable_region = 0, grp_unscalarized_data = 1, grp_same_access_path = 1, grp_partial_lhs = 0, grp_to_be_replaced = 0, grp_to_be_debug_replaced = 0} * access { base = (1991)'f', offset = 848, size = 8, expr = f[1][6].f1, type = char, reverse = 0, grp_read = 1, grp_write = 1, grp_assignment_read = 1, grp_assignment_write = 1, grp_scalar_read = 1, grp_scalar_write = 0, grp_total_scalarization = 0, grp_hint = 0, grp_covered = 1, grp_unscalarizable_region = 0, grp_unscalarized_data = 0, grp_same_access_path = 1, grp_partial_lhs = 0, grp_to_be_replaced = 1, grp_to_be_debug_replaced = 0} but somehow it does not create an access for _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <f[1][6], 32, 0>; _2 = (unsigned int) _1; note the real offender here is (again) optimize_bit_field_compare ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-27 9:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-09-27 7:25 [Bug rtl-optimization/107047] New: " absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn 2022-09-27 9:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-10-05 20:02 ` [Bug middle-end/107047] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-26 8:31 ` [Bug middle-end/107047] load introduced of struct/union " absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-107047-4-0fwe9MZujt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).