From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 85E403860743; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:25:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 85E403860743
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707935152;
	bh=R3QW8Vq3O7oQ5Lf+hDTZ7AFVJ+pppJdQILwA6NnDO3c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=S46esucpVmbGtYzJ6ygNUjKx/wR7y8jvqIl1u4mY77hLNGqX1KkaTqKG3BnnFGNa/
	 QE8bvwY4KAsyv990lwIrQUCP2fi61EiPo5Z5LdoGQIbGqOTyQcCj8TB7mX1SnPDfLd
	 uk1jeVJI3y+L9SX5AIwW1lIeFi6aRjmLUWtjqjjo=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/107071] gfortran.dg/ieee/modes_1.f90 fails on
 aarch64-linux
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:25:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107071-4-YDLEvtbW0j@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107071-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107071-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107071

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed, should we just xfail it on AArch64?=