From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 40DF53857351; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:16:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40DF53857351
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664486194;
	bh=hpBRcRMiBKtQEiLRY/WtflBMU4BkUqren4BHw/OU1QM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KppKbLS00PRO1f5VuS8MYgWqS60gUDYGaDNHI/Gu3UY8uSoqgp5bxiiXZU37kdpXH
	 7/xh6itrH4ruBb6h0mu14TnxoISZb4vgVy3soznB5xG4f4CaF4NPW6Kptijm1RWu2C
	 8KGezLoLss6U7wBjAv58ZyVv7cZ+9PvRx1l0z2y4=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/107075] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:461
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:16:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107075-4-x9xIsK0lbv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107075-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107075-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107075

--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> >=20
> > But maybe 'z' shouldn't be of static storage duration ...
>=20
> No, I think it shouldn't.  A should be static, and Z should not.

Well, I think the declaration

      integer, pointer :: z =3D> a(2)

makes pointer z IMPLICIT_SAVE.  At least I couldn't find anything in the
standard that makes an exception for declarations in a BLOCK construct.

This is confirmed by Intel and Cray and by replacing 'program p'
by 'subroutine p'.  And in line with gfortran...

Error: Pointer initialization target at (1) must have the SAVE attribute=