From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CE9523858C50; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 07:02:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CE9523858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682751725; bh=jLyla80kOa9PcojA/gvE40qzSS5j2Z3WjmICvNioJDA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g1I5y9Wd8Bplg+qP6/ObP/Yzm8lXqxgnVR/o0NKYDP5UHVC/zFA2mxxArf3mYLsBV X3OKkntZyYrdysfOS84QkkfyGW3epo0wt98cZLtoO32keFTkMtLtV6po6+EYNTBbcK 69+W95pyKN13RPDEo2A7JJRVvaAzuCNw1aXHy+DE= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107087] [12 Regression] bits/stl_algobase.h:431: warning: 'void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, unsigned int)' reading between 8 and 2147483644 bytes from a region of size 4 [-Wstringop-overread] Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 07:02:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107087 --- Comment #17 from Sam James --- ... yes, it is - I saw one of the patches I'd backported didn't apply, assu= med must've been this one when I saw something in summary about uninitialised. Anyway, I'll chuck it in now.=