From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2AB24385B50C; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:00:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2AB24385B50C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682596844; bh=iQjZFjxd3xWsKyAWrTTQ7S5OctIDv78khojrtT8IlNM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kDfRywK0zLf4Pr4ZA6j/13j+0GfoxnGI2ll04A6ex0VFcxXytKaAOYX727SgibdI3 LSwrKPBeLA2NKna50pXCvWCUZFA4UzeKWYe75DQYkfsxKNqNepUHWC9OOrDVgEe7zP 9RYca9/hCVphgpAx0kezy7sBBu+Q5t8njL3UTnpo= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107087] [12 Regression] bits/stl_algobase.h:431: warning: 'void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, unsigned int)' reading between 8 and 2147483644 bytes from a region of size 4 [-Wstringop-overread] Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:00:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107087 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think it should be fine. I would prefer to wait until 12.4 so it has more bake time, but that would just mean another few months of duplicate reports= for this issue.=