From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 218303858D1E; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 02:35:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 218303858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664505333;
	bh=699MITSA8pqteFJUup1uU/HNHAqGGQl3C3WPf25WVJg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EaSkDS/AB5OFSor5W3ZZ4q7XsBXgOEvh+Rcr6JnVUs3Fm6KIeDDt1105ct4C4u/SO
	 CpSGGOmCrdAUEfuzMo1j9XvN0paaK6lXkLrmDzEMdDJ4HKwoUD5sfz8Ho+736HRLlz
	 keWKZTIfhhsr+RnHM1/M51PQesyxijB65oxphVaQ=
From: "wcs84014 at xcoxc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/107089] Line-terminating '\' leaves the characters
 when the next-line is a multi-line comment
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 02:35:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wcs84014 at xcoxc dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107089-4-EHypTqpaQH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107089

--- Comment #2 from JohnDoe <wcs84014 at xcoxc dot com> ---
>Andrew Pinski=20
Thank you for your reply.

That's right. Therefore, I am currently using my own parser.
Nobody needs fix, so you can close this topic.

However, the cause of the bug seems to be a mistake in the pointer count as:
while(++p) <-> while(p++)

I already read the document:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlineDocscpp

I have used a little M4 in Autotools. Certainly POSIX, portable, real macro,
but minor. I tried to provide a mechanism to customize to ordinary users us=
ing
the CPP.=