From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 35B953858415; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:49:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 35B953858415 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665395384; bh=kGFK7iAH2R2j9MXpDNXV60Ab4oLYZP/YPXBlWSlScHs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JWajUEFX7KcYLzEjLLOZFKm6qmBw0cM9MYgw/ybtY/w6n1Ly1tWQ1JnHYnWZ+15DF pOvOmzs8QoO6mV7Z5FMCHkozLnhlPolQadyWobCOoqGJSh4p2ukLtW1kocTb6uRYGB 8RwH06LjCuIhhETmq+f5xTuk97VD2ddMEeIOOktg= From: "zhongyunde at huawei dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107090] [aarch64] sequence logic should be combined with mul and umulh Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:49:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: zhongyunde at huawei dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107090 vfdff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #53684|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from vfdff --- Created attachment 53685 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D53685&action=3Dedit [PHIOPT] Add A ? B + CST : B match and simplify optimizations Thank you for your guidance, I have referred to your patch linked to supple= ment the various types of operations. Due to an error in building the (op @1 (cond^ @0 @2 {build_zero_cst (type);= })), I have not incorporated the modifications into your patch at this time. If = it is your consent, I would like to merge these modifications separately. And = then finish up that patch, after asking for further information.=