public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10/11 Regression] Wrong codegen from TBAA when stores to distinct same-mode types are collapsed?
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:33:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107107-4-qbgBTh5Svs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107

--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
<rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa11fc62ddee81a8bc3e69d5e3180695a6dbb666

commit r11-10417-gfa11fc62ddee81a8bc3e69d5e3180695a6dbb666
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date:   Thu Oct 6 11:20:16 2022 +0200

    tree-optimization/107107 - tail-merging VN wrong-code

    The following fixes an unintended(?) side-effect of the special
    MODIFY_EXPR expression entries we add for tail-merging during VN.
    We shouldn't value-number the virtual operand differently here.

            PR tree-optimization/107107
            * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (visit_reference_op_store): Do not
            affect value-numbering when doing the tail merging
            MODIFY_EXPR lookup.

            * gcc.dg/pr107107.c: New testcase.

    (cherry picked from commit 85333b9265720fc4e49397301cb16324d2b89aa7)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-30 21:34 [Bug middle-end/107107] New: " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2022-10-01  2:25 ` [Bug middle-end/107107] " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2022-10-01  2:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-01  3:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-01  3:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-01  3:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-01 17:08 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-01 20:01 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2022-10-06  9:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-06  9:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-06 10:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-06 10:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 13:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-12 16:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-01-26 13:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-26 13:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107107-4-qbgBTh5Svs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).