From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 646A7385841F; Sat,  1 Oct 2022 17:08:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 646A7385841F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664644116;
	bh=H7rWdaKHfedm3pEQ3KiCL8pe3Byss0RLHzLde9vsVyA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ukR2dXR+5X+0svhybmt47wvxgPTliQkwEKe2Qp98pmUIQ1Gd0ohYcO3AY9CfXQEBl
	 FzPXVVkSNczHIwcRQ44CwFX+neHTrMNGSuAdk4Fktk6NYkSTZmKE57ekTzu7RCQzd2
	 WtNXAKP0zNKVMBX3UV5geQWRtOsp+2NDozVYcg9E=
From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong
 codegen from TBAA when stores to distinct same-mode types are collapsed?
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 17:08:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107107-4-uHsOEmJLbt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107107

Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #1)
> > There's also a potentially related test case at
> > https://godbolt.org/z/jfv1Ge6v4 - I'm not yet clear on whether it's lik=
ely
> > to have the same root cause.
>=20
> This might be a different issue I think.

Yeah, that's sched2 reordering the accesses (probably cselib is confused).
Needs a separate report.=