public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/107115] New: Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type? Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 20:00:39 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-107115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 Bug ID: 107115 Summary: Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bugdal at aerifal dot cx Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 53648 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53648&action=edit original test case by supercat The attached test case is from user supercat on Stack Overflow (original source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42178179/will-casting-around-sockaddr-storage-and-sockaddr-in-break-strict-aliasing/42178347?noredirect=1#comment130510083_42178347, https://godbolt.org/z/jfv1Ge6v4) and demonstrates what appears to be wrong TBAA optimization on an object with allocated storage whose effective type changes under stores. It was first presented as another example of this kind of problem alongside the example that became https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107, but it seems likely that the root cause is distinct. Reportedly clang/LLVM also transforms this example wrong. On 64-bit targets, the test program outputs 2/1 with optimization levels that enable -fstrict-aliasing. The expected output is 2/2. Using -fno-strict-aliasing fixes it.
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-01 20:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-10-01 20:00 bugdal at aerifal dot cx [this message] 2022-10-01 23:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/107115] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-01 23:51 ` [Bug middle-end/107115] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 9:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 12:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 12:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 15:19 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 15:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 15:39 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-06 19:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-07 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-07 7:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-07 13:19 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-27 22:19 ` gabravier at gmail dot com 2022-12-27 22:21 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-107115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).