From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B0EF53858D32; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:10:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B0EF53858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1664741415; bh=j6IkdrUvGkTOy6M7HIQ06d7qhVFZyMsk/nT2WQbmAeU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZKWOqUqK9oyNk/2vtXE4Glq9c9waISIZI4ttFMJfGFnBzTbcqYP3c/rVCtf5X88S+ V6vDJzbEZSmhtc8RJ/etsE/h9hSgQB4Qnx4UNU0xtLDNfQMv+3zh/lesl4T9Crut/m zcEfxl5UJNX/eayG1WppHZUSRTvrEkdG0I5U72BU= From: "jlame646 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/107126] GCC accepts invalid out of class definition for destructor with C++17 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:10:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jlame646 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107126 --- Comment #2 from Jason Liam --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > This is rejected with -std=3Dc++20 since > r11-532-g4b38d56dbac6742b038551a36ec80200313123a1 > and the commit log states that it is intentional to apply it only for C++= 20 > mode because the DR wasn't against C++17. > So why do you think otherwise? > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2237 > also states: > (Note that this resolution is a change for C++20, NOT a defect report > against C++17 and earlier versions.) First, you've clearly missed something here because this is not https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2237 . Note carefully that the above link that you provided was for declarations of cto= rs and dtors inside the class definition itself and not for declarations at namespace scope.=20 Second, i'm already aware that this is rejected by gcc with c++20 as i prov= ided a demo link https://godbolt.org/z/TYjEzss6q at the first line of my bug rep= ort.=