From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9B58C3858D32; Sun,  2 Oct 2022 19:41:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9B58C3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664739719;
	bh=TE8hbf+JR3Dz2VoOsCoUUyCTXgui4L4RN8rbc/SZKqk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=X68+aad4bDmeM2B3/Y2cuec6q4bLWLyg5VJ0pBIeyJebASlYzGHA3L64oaSreYAHE
	 WF2v9MSRvvJ0flueBwIo6Gy5KjDfTgAxEhSw4fd1aZY5GdwPvwJywb/hy7fLU5w2Ho
	 Wvkjg/gMkByFPVotlM2uJCAvjRrPHp/yO+/FiN3s=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107126] GCC accepts invalid out of class definition for
 destructor with C++17
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:41:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107126-4-IR8c5jLG8R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107126

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is rejected with -std=3Dc++20 since
r11-532-g4b38d56dbac6742b038551a36ec80200313123a1
and the commit log states that it is intentional to apply it only for C++20
mode because the DR wasn't against C++17.
So why do you think otherwise?
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2237
also states:
(Note that this resolution is a change for C++20, NOT a defect report again=
st
C++17 and earlier versions.)=