From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CED513858438; Mon,  3 Oct 2022 09:51:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CED513858438
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664790692;
	bh=0xn6J+pALjmF9mP7QQU3XCLzOnLzaKH7/Iu0dLUWyhA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=j8TnoQ+F7AahGIMigRGVZuXs2vGxRCSc3lkDVFfjmgZyxe46e4Rb6milTXb76oD8j
	 jkOWWVH9gM/JC2KGSmscL+IapsID5XeUhM/JljXMsGlocTfSPOmvVpB6Ne1uQ3CMQz
	 YQZuZRzeTxU97t2MljlJUIolaAHR/5WSxgz2qiwg=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107126] GCC accepts invalid out of class definition for
 destructor with C++17
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 09:51:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107126-4-Jp1uvMuIAY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107126

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://wg21.link/cwg1435 introduced the wording that allows this (which can
still be seen in the context for the [class.dtor] changes in CWG 2337):

"in a declaration at namespace scope or in a friend declaration, the
id-expression is nested-name-specifier ~class-name and the class-name names=
 the
same class as the nested-name-specifier."

https://wg21.link/p1787r6 changed that to:

"otherwise, the id-expression is nested-name-specifier ~class-name and the
class-name is the injected-class-name of the class nominated by the
nested-name-specifier."

This seems like a breaking change that was not obvious from the revision
history of the r5 paper:

- Required destructor declarations to use the injected-class-name, avoiding
name lookup
- Simplified lookup for destructors
- Specified that < begins a template argument list in a destructor name

All compilers accept the program in C++17 mode, and I don't think it's at a=
ll
clear that the code was always invalid in older standards, as you claim.=