From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BDBEF386075D; Sun,  2 Oct 2022 20:49:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BDBEF386075D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664743752;
	bh=muYaOMFAvt9h7v0mrUFtILRf1ibH1GZcvNcFqku3lRY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IU5FQf2HG1EOVvGo40B3iiUnr6TsDHNGQ5TmoPfv+lEJNnx8p56EBEHSfuhLActwF
	 uatHvoEnnFD3J02eCPs9w1hCS7YGdS9UwL02TBCBz8ti7nvcOGIufoXWiecN4U/wqC
	 XBGwqMc5JZvA3UylJqo4boC30HFC80/bctgu7HFE=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107126] GCC accepts invalid out of class definition for
 destructor with C++17
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:49:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107126-4-O6tnHl8RyF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107126

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Liam from comment #2)
> Second, i'm already aware that this is rejected by gcc with c++20 as i
> provided a demo link https://godbolt.org/z/TYjEzss6q at the first line of=
 my
> bug report.

One thing is to know that some versions of g++ do that, but the above provi=
des
details on what change actually changed the behavior, which is useful
information for any further changes.
Then it is https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1435.html which we perhaps
don't implement or don't implement fully.=