From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5EC453854806; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:27:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5EC453854806
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673627244;
	bh=MGsk9/3Ega5MhuZ8pkpTbyIoOBuob7a0J64VfP2Ym38=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YYa32JR/h0DdSvjf62RMB0RGahQN9GPHQ6H1zpeTI3bt/rrW5AkN6KX+a00+PA8cr
	 wi1DjUJhKCdlmODIFVq/ACnUw42ehEgJDnyY30OzEUb6t0zwdXh563yPHZzvp+nLuX
	 G1axrJFx80RIqBXOLFWk41Plhfv23FVU2WXTckW4=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107131] [11/12/13 Regression] wrong code with -Os
 -fno-ipa-vrp -fno-tree-bit-ccp
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:27:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107131-4-acy92QPQD1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107131

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
                   |                            |uros at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think the problem happens during combine.  Parts of the vector code relat=
ed
to:
  V b =3D (V) { } >=3D o;
  V c =3D b <=3D (V)(b >=3D (V) { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x90DF0BE3990AC871ULL });
- in particular the scalar c[5] computation, i.e.
unsigned long long b =3D 0 >=3D o ? -1ULL : 0ULL;
unsigned long long c =3D b <=3D (b >=3D 0x90DF0BE3990AC871ULL ? -1ULL : 0UL=
L) ? -1ULL
: 0ULL;
evaluates to 0 rather than -1 that it should when o is 0.

This boils down to:
__attribute__((noipa)) unsigned long long
foo (unsigned char o)
{
  unsigned long long t1 =3D -(long long) (o =3D=3D 0);
  unsigned long long t2 =3D -(long long) (t1 > 10439075533421201520ULL);
  unsigned long long t3 =3D -(long long) (t1 <=3D t2);
  return t3;
}

int
main ()
{
  if (foo (0) !=3D -1ULL)
    __builtin_abort ();
  return 0;
}
at -O2 or -Os, which was miscompiled starting with r12-303-g86403f4e6e5f7216
and got fixed with r13-3530-g0e36a9c6915c713d30.
No idea why this is marked as 11 regression though...

So, do we need to backport PR107172 change to 12 branch?=